April 2000
When Is
It Time to Leave?
Here Are 7 Signs of
When to Quit!
|
|
Dedication and focus cause
many local government
managers to resist thinking about when it
might be time
to leave their
positions.
In my 25 years of working with numerous managers, it has become obvious that fewer managers are retiring in their “dream jobs.” Fewer managers are able to remain healthy after 20 years in one place. Jobs go south, turn bad, so quickly—often without fanfare. Managers are not given the time either for course correction or for seeing projects through to the end. The dream changes, with survival taking center stage. Nightmares, and life in the survival mode, usually precede the loss of their dream jobs.
Statistics suggest that the median longevity for managing in one place ranges from five to seven years, except in California, where the range is shorter. New electorates often want their own people, so the manager’s welcome mat is removed. One manager may feel, “I can beat the odds,” or “It’s still worth a try.” Telling themselves, “I hear the footsteps at my back,” however, managers are not realizing that they are running faster to escape their upcoming problem and are in fact ignoring the wake-up calls.
Some managers have become more vigilant and are acknowledging that they don’t care for the people they see themselves as becoming (scapegoats chosen without reason, for instance). Is it time to leave? Today, it seems reasonable to ask: Why is it so difficult for local government managers to decide to leave?
Nightmares and the Survival
Mode
There seem to be
several interwoven and complex factors that explain the reluctance of managers
to leave their jobs. What I hear most often is the rationalization that “I am
not done; there is more I need to accomplish.” Another, subtler theme is “I am
not a quitter.” Many managers ignore the warning signs because “it’s so
inconvenient to uproot my family or children in school” or because “my lifestyle
is good; why change it unless it’s clear I have no choice?”
Administrators say to themselves, “This feeling, this perception of a warning bell, will pass (is it just a bad dream?), and I will ride it out.” The managerial thinking is “Ride it out!” After all, it may actually be a test of courage.
Sadly, attention paid to intuition may decrease as a function of time spent in one place. Intuitive feelings and themes are not mystical but are commonly experienced by managers and spouses alike.
Heed Your
Intuition
Current
experiences with managers in transition show that more public managers are
looking for new opportunities outside the public sector to satisfy their
yearnings for new experiences, excitement, compensation, and entrepreneurship.
People who are “change agents” appear to succumb earlier to these thoughts and
urges, as has been observed by more traditional managers.
For some, questions begin to surface, such as: “Have I done what I came here to do? What important contribution could I make in other arenas to solve complex social problems in education, development, or health care?” Some managers want challenges with different pressures from those of living in a public fishbowl. Some want to use their skills for higher or more idealistic purposes.
Higher financial gain often is secondary to other purposes as an impetus for leaving a current job. Frankly, many public managers have skills they want to exercise in a variety of businesses. Indeed, most public managers do possess skills that would enable them to operate in varied entrepreneurial environments.
The
Indicators
Experience with
many in-transition managers suggests at least seven reasons that reveal that it
may be time to leave. Apparently, no one reason causes a decision, but two to
three usually combine. It’s clear from my years of experience that one reason
usually outweighs the others.
Of the seven indicators listed, it’s interesting to note that four come from personal rather than outside influences. It’s time that witnessing traumatic firings among colleagues, as well as your own traumatic health warnings or family circumstances, become important in decisions to quit. Many professional organizations like ICMA, the California City Manager Foundation, and the Innovation Groups are supportive to the manager who is in transition.
Here are the seven major reasons for
quitting:
This burnout symptom is like a
psychological train moving through your life as you are trying to decide
whether to buy a ticket. The clear message is that it’s time for you to embark
on a different journey. Buy the ticket to change.
Managers caught in this dilemma experience
less ability to delegate, longer hours, and less satisfaction. Aggravation
with staff and elected officials becomes evident and pronounced. Interjecting
yourself into all projects or micromanaging them often is a necessary result.
In burnout, intuition should tell the manager and family, “We are not in
balance here.”
The manager who is out of sync usually
directly contributes to intrastaff conflicts that go unsolved and unmediated.
Resulting organizational behavior either drifts or otherwise moves in a
different direction from that of the boss, creating alignment issues. Within a
short time, the disparate goals and organizational misalignment cause clashes
in values, which usually indicate that leadership has gone out of sync with
the team or even that there is no team!
Elected officials must decide whether the
current manager is part of their plan. Sixty percent of newly elected,
one-term officials want to improve or change the current way of doing
business. The simplest way is to change the manager. Managers need to renew
their agreements with all newly elected officials and not simply to assume the
best (see Darcey/Caravalho’s December 1999 PM article on manager evaluations).
The key question for the manager becomes: “What does superior performance look
like to the new group?”
Becoming aware and “okay” with the phase after public management provides the professional manager with an easier transition and clearer thinking in decision making.
Clearly, survival is not enough for managers
to think about when considering the next phase of their lives. Their thinking
should consist of such thoughts as these: “What different talents do I need to
use? What is next? And what new challenge do I need?”
Some get openly resentful of or rebellious against public scrutiny. “Open access to my family, children, and finances becomes burdensome.” Managers under pressure may come to resent the public’s critique: “It is no longer part of the job—it now is unacceptable to my family.” “Enough is enough.”
R. William Mathis, Ph.D. (e-mail, R. William Mathis), is a consulting psychologist in Napa, California.
Copyright © 2000 by the International City/County Management Association (ICMA)